May 23, 2013

When our Neurons are Connected to the Net

Neuron Culture

Image Credit Urbagram.net

Not too long ago, I was having a casual but meaningful digital conversation with a couple of gentlemen that I respect. They both have large networks, good street cred, and active digital profiles.

I asked the question: “Who are the top 3 people you respect in “the space”?

The response from one was thoughtful and quick. 3 names with brief reasons why.  I benefited as relational capital and intelligence were quickly transferred. It was one interaction in a regular stream of sharing between us. I quickly found each of the mentioned names online.  None of them have high digital influence scores, nor significantly active social profiles or presences. However, I began following them and evaluating some of the work and comments of theirs that was able to find.

Quickly I recognized that this was influence in action. Someone I knew, respected, and trusted had given me a gift, pointed me in a new direction, and even though in just a very small way, had changed my behavior for a few minutes, and perhaps my scope of view and thinking for a longer period of time.

What I also recognized that this interaction was not visible to any of today’s “influence ranking” systems like Klout, PeerIndex, Kred, or the recently released Little Bird.

I shared this observation with my two friends and asked “Will we ever have the technology to connect the dots between what just happened and true influence?”  My other colleague quickly replied “when our neurons are connected to the net”.

But will we need to wait that long?

  • Are the reputation systems of today void of any value at all?
  • What if I don’t want everything I do and everyone I know to be available for consumption and analysis?
  • If I opt out, will I essentially be opting out of future society?

The concept introduces a whole slew of new considerations, opportunities, and privacy and transparency concerns.

Om Malik riffs in a recent post:

At present we rank photos, rate restaurants, like or dislike brands, retweet things we love. But if this idea of collaborative consumption takes hold — and I have no reason to think it won’t — we will be building a quantified society. We will be ranking real humans. The freelance workers — like the Uber drivers and Postmates couriers — are getting quantified. The best ones will continue to do well, but what about the others, the victims of this data darwinism? Do they have any protection or any rights?

We continue to leverage machines to help us to our jobs better. We continue to teach them more and more – how to reason and think like a human. The traditional response is that it can never be done. But IBM Watson‘s jeopardy perhaps requires us to take a deeper look and do a closer analysis. It is predicted that in just a few years, the processing power of IBM Watson will be contained in the size of a smartphone. We can and likely will have a super human intelligent friend with us.  What is worthy of world wide fame and media coverage today may arguably be just part of human existence in just a few years. We’ve seen this pattern continually reinforce itself repeatedly over shorter and shorter time horizons over the last few decades.

Some will quickly reply that Watson is capable of finding facts, but the things that make us uniquely human, namely emotions;  Being funny, being sexy, being loving, these are very complicated and intelligent behaviors may forever be separated from the realm of machines.

It’s a reasonable argument and one I currently subscribe to, but there is a dissenting argument that perhaps emotions are simply the highest form of humanity, may also be able to be taught and learned by machines.  In fact, Ray Kurzweil predicts that in less than 20 years, computers will be capable and will perhaps surpass a full range of human capabilities.

This computer is thousands of times more powerful than the computer I used as a student, and it’s 100,000 times smaller. In 25 years, it will be a billion times more powerful in price performance, a billion times more powerful per dollar, and 100,000 times smaller.

It’ll be the size of a blood cell. They’ll be going through our body and keeping us healthy from the inside.

Not as futuristic as it sounds. People have already been doing that in animal models. There are people walking around with computers attached to their brains, like Parkinson’s patients, the latest generation of which allows you to download new software to the computer that’s connected into your brain from outside the patient. Right now that requires surgery because it’s pea-sized. But it will be blood-cell-size in 25 years, and we will be able to introduce it noninvasively.

We’re collectively on a unprecedented journey that surely holds unprecedented disruption and opportunity for individuals and organizations alike. We’re about to witness the next experiment be unleashed as Google Glass begins shipping to early adopters in the coming weeks. If you haven’t seen it, the video below provides a 2 minute preview of what’s possible today along the road to deeper human and technology integration.

  • What will these changes mean for your personal life?
  • What new opportunities are being unlocked for your organization?
  • How can you leverage the deeper integration between technology and humans to understand your customers better and deliver superior experiences for them?
  • What are the biggest barriers to leveraging these new technologies, internally and for your customer base?

What will CRM look like over the next 5 years? Software Advice Interview Highlights

Innovantage Logo

Ashley Verrill – a expert with CRM reviewer SoftwareAdvice.com – interviewed me recently for the second edition of CRM’s Next 5 in 5. This report was an update from predictions five of my industry cohorts made about technologies that will change CRM in the next five years. Special thanks to Ashley for the conversation and for providing the edited snapshot of our discussion below:

Ashley: You’ve talked a lot about how the importance of advancements relative to contextualizing CRM — such as Mobile, Big Data and Social – are a little over amplified (though still important). From your perspective, are there any products or services out there that have actually made real innovation and change to how we use CRM systems?

Brian: Digital networks have significantly transformed how we as people interact with other people, information, and increasingly devices and machines. More and more of our lives are moving into the digital realm. Where we are. What we are doing. Who we know. What we say or think or like. The technologies that capitalize on this increasing wealth of information are the ones that will endure past the hype. These innovators will advance our capabilities in three primary ways:

  • One, they will elevate our prospect and customer discovery capabilities via Linkedin, Twitter, GooglePlus and other niche social communities. These services listen for conversations from those that might be interested in your products or services.
  • Next, we should expect significant advancements around harnessing data for customer understanding and deeper segmentation. These products aggregate digital and social signals with profile information to provide an added layer of context and the opportunity for new market segments. I also know of a few organizations that are experimenting with using social influence to prioritize customer service response.
  • Finally, I see huge opportunity in the customer communities space. Companies like Lithium, BazaarVoice, Get Satisfaction, and Jive are a few enabling such brand-owned communities. Despite mixed fanfare, there are plenty of case studies proving return on investment through reduced customer service costs, increased word-of-mouth marketing, and invaluable insights from listening to thousands of interactions.

 

Ashley: In the past, you’ve talked about how these trends are bubbling up around the edges. What’s stopping them from becoming mainstream now?

Brian: Organizations and individuals are wrestling just to understand what’s happening, let alone adopt. We’ve never had access to so much data about everything – from weather patterns, to location data, to spending habits, to internet browsing behavior. The reality of it is that most of it is just noise and not useful to us. So, as quickly as we race to gather data, we realize it’s hard to filter, and it’s hard to aggregate into meaningful ways.

 

Ashley: So are saying it’s more of a cultural gap that technical?

Brian: There is a disconnect between the way organizations have worked for the last 80 or 100 years and what’s increasingly possible. In general, few organizations are built to identify, consider, plan, and take actions that fully leverage these new capabilities. They work under an industrial age model which requires relatively static models of research, investments, and feedback loops, a stark contrast to a real time, agile, flat organization model that is continually in a state of evolution. The retrenching and adoption often requires new management structures, new people, new mindsets. It’s disruptive and disruptive is not always convenient or beneficial.

In most situations, we’re talking about significant shifts in culture, management practices, processes. It will take some time.

 

Ashley: : You wrote an article about optimizing the full spectrum of customer interactions. Have you seen technologies yet that effectively enable this sort of communication optimization?

Brian: I’ve yet to see any technology that can do this the way it should be done. There are many that are seeking to build, but many from an analog / pre-digital revolution core. In addition, many organizations are just now still trying to merge interactions across channels.

Merging web with phone and email for many organizations is still quite a challenge, as it means combining data from five, ten, or even 25 customer databases. Most companies that I’ve seen make progress in this regard have a central hub that gathers all data into a unified profile and enables multi-channel communication from there.

 

Ashley: So are there any innovators in this space you see?

Brian: Look at what Google is doing with Google Now. They are merging experiences across screens and channels and venturing into the world of predictive analytics, surfacing information that you may not even be aware that you want.

Recently, information taken from my Google searches or web activity or my email threads are leading to contextual “cards” showing up on my Android phone. Anything with a digital footprint can be tracked. Remember, as more and more of our lives take place digitally, the potential to create compelling and unified omni-channel experiences becomes more pronounced.

 

Ashley: I wasn’t as convinced by this prediction in last year’s CRM’s 5 in 5, but Lauren wrote about Brent Leary’s opinions that CRM integration with television was on the horizon. Have you seen any advancements on this front?

Brian: There are a lot of studies coming out about dual screening or multi-screening. People are sharing, reading, researching, playing games while watching TV. That is a fact at this point and I believe the trend is here to stay. If you consider all that the web has been able to do with cookies and other tracking technology, the re-targeting ad market, google’s relevant search results, it’s not much of a stretch to imagine that same thing on another screen with media.

 

Ashley: What form do you see this interactivity taking in the next few years?

Brian: Over the next few years, I believe we’ll see more and more interactive integration with TV’s and the continued evolution of Smart TVs. Seeing what your neighborhood, city, friends are watching, optionally tracking their comments on the TV itself and/or your connected device is likely coming.

 

Ashley: Sounds like Spotify for television. How does this translate into a business opportunity?

Brian: Obviously when content producers and advertisers gain access to this data about what you are watching and sharing with friends, they can build and present more relevant content and offers. Think like Netflix and Amazon’s suggested titles or “what to watch next.” This will start with contextualized ads, then evolve to include product placement. I’d say it’s inevitable.

 

Ashley: Last year and again this year, we talked a lot about unified communications with Paul Greenberg. He believes Microsoft is really the only player that could make an effective move on this front by combining Skype, Sharepoint, Assure, and their other communication properties.

Do you agree with Paul that Microsoft is the only one that could potentially make this UC move, but won’t this year?

Brian: I’m not sure that I agree that Microsoft is in the lead here. Maybe in the context of today’s major CRM players, that is a true statement. But companies like Cisco and Avaya and other telecommunications are far ahead on some of those enterprise class technologies. Google is another one to watch out for. Gmail and Google Apps continues to grow, with GooglePlus and Hangouts. They are moving into that foray in a very interesting way with most people not aware of where this could go.

The others are just a couple of acquisitions away from making a play in the UC space, which I’ll likely write more about soon.

 

Ashley: Last year, we quoted Brian Solis talking about how gamification will move beyond marketing for loyalty. In the past year, I’ve seen a lot of development in gamification as far as using it with social enterprise apps to foster collaboration, which is something you’ve also talked about.

What specific technologies have made the most headway in gamifying the social business in the past year?

Brian: I think gamification is a widely misunderstood and misused term. At it’s core, it’s simply about incentivizing human behavior. Bunchball and Badgeville are clearly the two leaders in this emerging space, especially as it relates to incentivizing behaviors on internal social networking platforms. I do think that we’re in for a lot of trial and error here.

 

Ashley: Why do you say trial and error? What still needs to be figured out?

Brian: In my observation, it seems that we’re still a ways off from identifying and incentivizing real valuable digital actions. Most of the case studies that I’ve seen to date are simply incentivizing participation, which is a start, but not very meaningful in the long run. When you’re talking about human behavior, there are a lot of psychological and sociological factors at play. Most technologists and even managers likely don’t have the domain knowledge they need to leverage gamification techniques to the extent that they could.

As I laid out in the post you referred to, I believe there’s plenty of opportunity to begin to present the right challenges to the right people and incentivize them to take the proper actions.

 

Ashley: Finally, are there other innovations we haven’t talked about that you seeing changing CRM as we know it in the next five years?

Brian: I think we’ll see more automation in general. We’re seeing this become more mainstream from a marketing perspective. The ability to track behaviors and create a series of if/then trees that help to to move prospects along the customer journey will likely continue to play a more important role over the next few years. Extending the data set to multiple channels will lead to more discovery about customer behavior, and how to respond in a way that resonates.

At the same time, I expect we’ll likely see continued focus on understanding and improving the customer experience. In a world that quickly races towards commoditization, “experience” becomes more important for customer loyalty, retention, and mindshare.

 

Ashley: What about the “X” Factor. What’s still unknown that could inhibit any of these developments?

Brian: Security and privacy are big unknowns in all of these things that we’re talking about and may be the single biggest factor in changing the trajectory of how we as a society and as corporate citizens adopt and implement these new emerging technologies.

Everybody’s talking about Customer Experience. Customers still not getting what they need.

Performance_Gap

Lots of executives, marketers, customer service folks say they work for a customer focused organization. They say they care about the customer experience. According to a myriad of research reports, blogs, tweets, podcasts, and whitepapers, I see an increased focused on customer focus, customer experience, customer engagement, customer intimacy, etc. etc.

This is undoubtedly the right direction, and frankly the only direction for corporate survival and growth, in my opinion. A key and often underrepresented component of developing meaningful and profitable customer relationships is TRUST. I’ve written more about that here.

So how are we collectively doing being customer focused? Do “what we say” and “what we do” actually line up?

According to the latest edition of the Edelman Trust Barometer, the Top 5 Trust Building Attributes between companies and customers are:

1. Offers high quality products and services
2. Listens to customer needs and feedback
3. Treats employees well
4. Places customers ahead of profits
5. Takes responsible actions to address an issue or a crisis.

In the latest CEO Survey by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 82% of the CEOs in the survey said they were going to spend time changing their customer strategies in 2013.

That’s good, because below is a chart from the Edelman Trust Barometer showing that the drivers of trust and the perceived performance of businesses to achieve that trust are miles apart.

Performance_Gap

Imagine that you walked into your individual performance review and you got 3s 4s, and 5s on a 10 point scale across the board. That’s essentially what we collectively just received from our customers.

Are you shocked? Surprised? Upset? Ready to take action? Perhaps you’re saying that “that doesn’t apply to us”.

Many of you are probably moving into action as you read this. “We’ve got to do better. We’ve got to ask our customers what we can do better!” Great. But before you build and send out that next customer survey, please consider reading the following from a recent article in the Harvard Business Review (emphasis added is mine):

The great majority of the decisions we make in our information-overloaded, distraction-heavy lives are made outside our conscious awareness, driven more by contexts than cognitions. As a result, asking someone to pinpoint what will influence them in the future is a bit like saying, “tell me how you will behave in the future when you are not thinking about what I have just asked you about?”

Behavioural scientists Wes Schultz and Robert Cialdini provide compelling evidence of why asking people to predict what will influence their future decisions and behaviors is so often ineffective. In one set of studies, they asked several hundred homeowners in California to predict which of four messages would be most successful at persuading them to take steps to conserve energy and reduce their overall consumption. The four messages were 1) conserving energy helps the environment; 2) conserving energy protects future societies; 3) conserving energy saves you money; 4) many of your neighbors are already conserving energy.

Those shown the message about what their neighbors were doing rated it as the least likely to influence their behaviours. Yet when meter readings were taken, the researchers discovered that this was the most effective message when it came to changing behavior even though this same message was rejected by most as having any sway. Even though most will deny its effect, our desire to keep up with the Joneses is both universal and automatic. For example, recent studies have shown that compared to the usual approach of threatening those who fail to pay their taxes on time with fines, it is far more effective to inform them that the majority of people in their neighborhood already have paid. By doing so, governments can realize many more millions in revenues.

Not only are we pretty poor at recognizing what will influence our future behavior, we’re not that great at recognizing what persuaded us after the event either. In one well-known study conducted at a busy New York City subway station, after counting the percentage of commuters who donated to a street musician as they walked past him, researchers made one small change to the situation: Immediately before an approaching commuter reached the musician, another person (who was in on the act) would drop a few coins into the musician’s hat. The result? An eight-fold increase in donations. When interviewed afterwards, those who donated universally failed to attribute their actions to the fact they had seen someone else give money first, preferring instead to provide alternate (and incorrect) justification for their actions. “I liked the song he was playing”; “I’m a generous person”; and “I felt sorry for the guy.”

Aside from showing the tremendous power of social proof, the above also provides a solid argument that understanding what will resonate most with a customer may often not be provided by the customer. There’s a great dialogue about this on Wim Rampen’s outstanding and thoughtful blog post titled “The Customer is Always Wrong”.

Cracking the code on your customer’s jobs to be done, their (intrinsic and extrinsic) motivations, their behaviors and habits have the potential to provide the real clues that we need to develop ongoing relationships of increasing value exchange.

So, how will we get better at serving our customers more effectively and building more trust?

The detailed answers to this are highly contextual and we don’t quite have time or room in today’s post. Many of us are indeed overwhelmed by the inertia of our own embedded behaviors, assumptions, and drivers, which by the way is one reason I would propose that we see such a significant disconnect in the chart above. But one often overlooked consideration I’d like to offer is to include the core motivators of all humans when considering what products and services to offer, and more importantly how we communicate with them.

Referencing the research done and presented by Australian psychologist, social researcher and novelist, Hugh Mackay, Naomi Simson offers the following as the core motivators for our (customer’s) decision making:

The desire to be taken seriously. We need to know we exist, that we’re valued, that we’re being listened to. This desire is why good listeners are so valued in the workplace. And why when you feel so bad when you realise someone is looking over your shoulder when you’re talking to them, rather than listening to what you have to say.

The desire for ‘my place’. We all need places that feel like ours, places that symbolise who we are. This is why, for some people, hot desks and open plan offices create a certain amount of disconnect and dissatisfaction at work.



The desire for something to believe in. We all desire a framework of values in our lives, values we can live by. If the organisation we work for has integrity, it can form an important part of our value set.

The desire to connect. Not only do we feel connected to people around us at work through everyday interactions, we also use work to connect deeper to ourselves. For some people their work is an expression of their self. 


The desire to feel useful. The one thing we least want to hear ourselves described as is ‘useless’. Wanting to be useful is fundamental to being part of society. This is the reason that people pull together in times of disaster to help complete strangers… to feel they are doing something useful.

The desire to belong. According to Hugh, we are both ‘herd animals’, and ‘tribal creatures’. We like to feel part of a group, as well as part of something bigger. The best workplace contains rich gratification through both a small herd (work group) and the sense of being a part of the company, the tribe.

The desire for control. Hugh believes this desire is the one most likely to get us into trouble. Humans are by nature uncontrollable. The only person we can control is ourselves.

Three Questions until next time

  • Are you REALLY investing in the customer experience, or does this just seem to be the next best wave to get what you want from customers?
  • How are you aligning your products, services, and customer communications with these core human motivators?
  • How are you weaving offerings and communication into the customer journey that help meet these desires?

Rapid digital innovation fueling vast complexity and opportunity for customer experience executives

EmergingFrontiers

I was recently invited to keynote a series of executive events hosted by NICE Systems. For those unaware, NICE serves over 25,000 organizations in the enterprise and security sectors, representing a variety of sizes and industries in more than 150 countries, and including over 80 of the Fortune 100 companies.

At the start of each session, I encouraged contact center and customer experience executives from American Express, Disney, Coca-Cola, Staples, eBay, JP Morgan Chase, Citi, Discover, and several other organizations to commit with me to ask great questions together for the balance of the afternoon.

We are in an era where asking great questions, and collectively pursuing answers together is a necessity. The accelerating pace of technological innovation is disrupting every industry, every best practice, and democratizing opportunity across the globe. The concepts of the learning organization continue to gain traction and has fueled much of the Enterprise 2.0 / Social Business movement over the past decade.

I asked the respective audience(s) in Orlando, Austin, and Salt Lake City to consider the following:

From there, we discussed two major trends:

1. Greater Connectedness

Fundamentally, the reasons that humans connect haven’t changed in millennia. We still share our names, where we’re from, what we do, our interests, preferences, who we know, what we like to do. We form communities of interest, or passion, or purpose. What has changed is that for the first time in the history of the world, billions of people can connect with billions of people.

  • Connections between humans are becoming smarter and faster
  • Interactions are on a stage for the world to see and respond to
  • Digital interactions can now be analyzed for a deeper understanding of the impact of communications between neighbors, brands, enemies, peers, competitors, etc.

According to Peter Diamandis

Right now, a Maasai warrior(a semi-nomadic people from Kenya) on mobile phone has better mobile communications than President Reagan did 25 years ago; And if that same Maasai were on Google, he would have access to more information than President Clinton did just 15 years ago.

.

2. The Digitization of Everything

More and more of our world is being absorbed into a digital format. What we do, where we go, what we learn, what we buy is moving rapidly into the digital realm. From the annihilation of music and print media industries to implanted chips in the military, to smart devices and cars, to “humans on a chip”, and tracking entire ecological systems at a micro or nano level.

What is the impact? Chris Anderson once said, “Every industry that becomes digital eventually becomes FREE”.

If every industry is indeed moving into the digital realm, is every industry indeed moving towards free? Perhaps the better question is “Are your products and services being rapidly commoditized?”

This week I just read how a company is India is working towards distributing a fully functioning tablet computer for $20.

Where Customer Experience Fits

The imaginary world discussed at the beginning of the presentation is the real world of the near future.

In an era where anyone has access to nearly everyone or anything from anywhere, how will you compete? How will you differentiate? How will you create value?

If this line of thinking isn’t on your radar, it should be. It’s critical.

In an era of rapid commoditization, the customer experience is one of the most difficult things to duplicate. Your customers really only want two things from you:

1. Help them accomplish what they’re trying to do, and/or
2. Help them to “feel good”

(I guess I could add a few more through a slightly different lens, like the “Six Things Customers Want”)

These both require an increasingly intimate knowledge of who your customers are, and what they’re trying to accomplish. While traditional products and services are indeed being commoditized, the ability to harness, capture, and utilize unprecedented access to information gives those who are able to identify customer behaviors, needs, preferences, jobs, decision drivers, creatively problem solve, and harness capabilities to create products and services that are simple to understand and consume will win.

Some of the emerging frontiers and opportunities are in the slide below.

In Summary

The two major trends highlighted above are converging to put pressure on nearly every institution, especially for-profit corporations. Customer experience is continuing to move towards the forefront of differentiation capabilities in an increasingly connected, fast paced, digital world. Ironically, the distribution of channels and interactions is simultaneously adding significant complexity to defining and understanding customer journeys, and the impact of a myriad of interactions across that journey.

I’ve included a copy of the entire deck below. I look forward to your thoughts and comments.

Creating Measurable Business Value through Social Collaboration

Source: McKinsey Global Institute: The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

Well, it’s only taken us 3,000 years, but we’re finally getting back together. You may be familiar with this story from Genesis.

But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower the people were building. The Lord said, “If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.”

So the Lord scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building the city. That is why it was called Babel —because there the Lord confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord scattered them over the face of the whole earth.

Three thousand years later, we may still be scattered. but we are increasingly finding new ways to connect and collaborate. We’ve been slowly and steadily re-connecting and rebuilding, and extending the scope and complexity of our circles along the way; at an accelerating pace over the past century. The internet, social networks, and cloud computing continue to provide innovative pathways to new forms of collaboration. One recent example is Highlight which helps strangers nearby connect to each other. Qualcomm’s Gimbal platform is providing us a glimpse of the next generation web and increased use of contextual awareness. The next generation of applications leveraging rapid connection and collaboration capabilities will continue to stretch boundaries, disrupt incumbents, and create new opportunities for arbitrage.

From an enterprise perspective, new threats and opportunities also exist. In fact, every institution is being affected, and I can’t think of anyone or anything that won’t be impacted by the rewiring of institutions currently upon us.

The McKinsey Global Institute just released a great study titled “The Social Economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies”

The 184 page report makes the argument that social technologies could potentially contribute $900 billion to $1.3 billion in annual value across four commercial sectors: consumer packaged goods, retail financial services, advanced manufacturing, and professional services.

Perhaps what’s most interesting is that it goes on to make the argument that the majority of the potential for value gain comes from improvements in internal collaboration. The study highlights ten ways social technologies can add value in organizational functions within and across enterprises.

Source: McKinsey Global Institute: The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies

No matter who you are, or what you do, the enterprise levers highlighted as 9 and 10 are relevant to every part of every organization. Finding the right people, the right information, and leveraging those assets to help accomplish stated goals in a quicker more efficient manner is the crux behind this entire movement.

In three surveys conducted annually between 2009 and 2011, the TOP 3 areas where measurable gains were consistently realized by companies leveraging Web 2.0 technologies internally were:

  • Increasing speed to access knowledge
  • Reducing communication costs
  • Increasing speed to access internal experts

However, where most companies appear to be stuck is in the area of cultural transformation, which is much easier said than done. Morphing from centralized, command and control hierarchies into decentralized, adaptive, and agile organizations takes time, and there is not yet a well defined methodology for doing so, though thousands of experiments are currently under way.

While business leaders wrestle with evolving their industrial age organizations to compete in a more connected and fast changing world, CIOs must also adapt their approach to empowering the next generation enterprise. The purposes, tools, deployment strategies, and economic evaluation required to empower the next generation of institutions are different, highlighted by the chart below.

Source: McKiinsey Global Institute  - The social economy: Unlocking value and productivity through social technologies

The McKinsey study contains a wealth of data and insights and creates a compelling case for the tangible business value of social technologies, most of which has yet to be achieved my most organizations.

As your organization transitions from experimental mode to making the internal business case for tangible business value, what have the most compelling findings or hardest challenges been? Where are you stuck and how can I help?

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

Leveraging Social Business & Gamification to achieve Organizational Flow

Flow

Between Arousal and Control lies Flow.

We could probably stop there (but don’t – read on).

Think on that for just a minute. Lots of Mindsparks emerge quickly for me.

When I first heard this quote, Guy Stephens was live tweeting Michael Wu’s session at Digital Surrey last summer. It actually brought to mind the visual below.

IMG Source: http://v1.centralstory.com/about/squiggle/

It illustrates the process of design, of solving or simplifying a problem, of creating something new, …

The process isn’t linear. It isn’t exact. Early on, it’s all over the place, searching for it’s legs, looking for answers, for patterns, for structure. Eventually, clarity and focus is found.

In a business (and societal) environment where more of the “typical” is complex and chaotic, I see this pattern playing out more often, with higher frequency, not just in the world of design, but an expanding arena of domains.

What my friend, Dr. Wu was referring to in his presentation, however, was the flow model which categorizes mental state in terms of challenge level and skill level. It was created by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, a psychology professor who has been recognized as “the world’s leading researcher on positive psychology”.

The flow state is the ideal mental state. It’s being in the zone – the groove. It’s where happiness is achieved, and productivity is its highest.

From Wikipedia:

The idea of flow is identical to the feeling of being in the zone or in the groove. The flow state is an optimal state of intrinsic motivation, where the person is fully immersed in what he is doing. This is a feeling everyone has at times, characterized by a feeling of great absorption, engagement, fulfillment, and skill—and during which temporal concerns (time, food, ego-self, etc.) are typically ignored.

In an interview with Wired magazine, Csíkszentmihályi described flow as “being completely involved in an activity for its own sake. The ego falls away. Time flies. Every action, movement, and thought follows inevitably from the previous one, like playing jazz. Your whole being is involved, and you’re using your skills to the utmost.

It’s the last sentence that should capture the attention of executives. The persistent questions (should) remain.

*** How can I create an environment where my employees and external contributors are consistently maximizing the use of their skills?

*** What would my organization look like if more of my employees were engaged in the flow state more of the time?

Leveraging Social Business and Gamification to achieve Organizational Flow

As the image illustrates, putting complex challenges in front of people who don’t have the necessary skills, creates anxiety. Putting low challenge tasks in front of skilled workers causes them to relax or be bored.

However, creating an environment where challenging tasks are placed in front of moderately skilled workers creates a state of arousal. When the skill level moderately surpasses the challenge, a mental state of control emerges. Between these positive states, lies the holy grail called “flow”. The key is creating and refreshing alignment between skill level and challenge level.

I would submit while the research is mostly focused on individuals, theoretically this concept should be able to be extended to entire organizations.

*** How can an organization exist in a perpetual state of flow, operating at peak performance where skills and challenges are aligned for maximum productivity?

Here’s where the concepts and practices of social business and gamification can play significant roles.

One of the core foundational benefits that exist in leveraging social technologies is heightened awareness of who, what, and where things are happening within the context of any given network (public or private).

One of the biggest traditional problems for organizations of all sizes is that existing challenges aren’t even known, and if there are known, no one is quite sure who has the best skillset to solve them. Traditionally and today, there is a ton of wasted opportunity in identifying challenges/opportunities and getting the right people to solve them, creatively and collaboratively.

The heightened ambient information exchange that social technologies enable, properly applied, can facilitate better alignment of skills and challenges for individuals and organizations, respectively. This (along with a host of other benefits) is fueling the rush to build and acquire social tools by the major technology vendors. Social is a core component for the next generation enterprise (thought most are still wrestling to understand what these new technologies really mean and how to properly apply and integrate them).

Additionally, one of the key components of flow is that the activity is intrinsically rewarding for the individual. Game designers have long leveraged flow dynamics in game design to help tap into intrinsic motivation factors while creating a progressive journey where skill and challenge levels move in close alignment.

While still in a relatively nascent stage (in the area of concept/prototype in the squiggly design graph above), layering gamification concepts and technology on top of social networks to provide a work environment where a state of flow can be reached by more people, more often may be a significant contributor on the next frontiers of productivity and innovation.

This post was written as part of the IBM for Midsize Business program, which provides midsize businesses with the tools, expertise and solutions they need to become engines of a smarter planet.

How Social Technologies Contribute to a Better Customer Experience

CustomerExperience_WatermarkConsulting

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

During each interaction with a brand, organization, or institution, the person on the other end of the interaction has a perception of how things went. Over time, the accumulation of these touch points deepen the customer’s perception of the organization. These perceptions influence actions (to engage, to buy, to defect, to complain, to share the experience with others…). These actions and interactions establish the long term relational value between organizations and their customers.

For these reasons, a growing focus amongst companies of all sizes is being placed on enhancing customer experience. The argument is that in a world where the journey towards products and services commoditization is brief, one of the last remaining competitive advantages is the customer experience. It is the one thing that is nearly impossible to duplicate.

Customers have confirmed its importance in multiple surveys.

A recent study by RightNow concluded that 86% of consumers would pay more for a better customer experience, and 89% of consumers began doing business with a competitor following a poor customer experience.

Each year, Forrester Research compiles their Customer Experience Index, where consumers are asked about their preferences and experiences with brands. Companies are then ranked and categorized. Over the past several years, Customer Experience consulting firm, Watermark Consulting has been comparing the financial performance of the Leaders and Laggards from the Customer Experience Index. The results make a strong case that a better customer experience leads to better performance and profitability of organizations.

Customer Experience Leaders outperform by 22.5% while laggards underperform by 46.3%.

However, it’s important to remember that correlation is not always causation. It’s a data point, and a potentially valuable one.

Other research suggests that growing numbers of senior executives and boards are placing customer experience as a top strategic priority. According to surveys done by customer experience firm Beyond Philosophy:

  • 95% of senior business leaders say that the Customer Experience is the next competitive battle ground.
  • 85% of senior business leaders say that differentiating on traditional dimensions is no longer a sustainable competitive strategy.

Gartner, in its latest CIO survey, found that:

CIOs ranked customer relationship management (CRM) as their No. 8 technology priority for 2012, according to a global survey of CIOs by Gartner, Inc.’s Executive Programs. CRM moved up from the No. 18-ranked technology in 2011.

Additionally, Gartner’s 2012 CEO Survey found that CEOs cited CRM as their most important area of investment to improve their business over the next five years.

Customer Experience vendors are benefiting from the increased mandate to improve the customer experience. In a recent survey by the Temkin group, more than eight out of 10 vendors expect their 2012 revenues to outpace 2011 by at least 25% and one-fifth of the vendors expect an increase of more than 75%.

An Explosion of Channels, Interactions, and Touchpoints

Complicating matters of orchestrating improved customer experiences is the proliferation of channels and digital interactions. Not only do customers now interact with organizations on many more channels than they did a decade ago, they also interact with peers, industry analysts, mainstream media, and citizen journalists on multiple channels as well. Each of these interactions contribute to the perception of the company or brand in the mind of the customer.

Customers are increasingly expecting organizations to respond quickly on their preferred channel in alignment with their increasing expectations. At each stage of their journey, there is a certain set of expectations. Depending on the stage in the customer’s journey, expectations might include more information, a resolved customer service issue, a technical problem solved, a purchase transaction, and then everything that happens while the product or service is put to use.

At the simplest level, a study by Bain & Co., found that customers who engage with companies over social media spend 20% to 40% more money with those companies than other customers.

There’s more to social than just gathering likes and follows.

As the interactions between organizations and their customers become more fragmented and dynamic, Social and Collaborative technologies can play a key role in helping organizations differentiate themselves.

(1) Listen across a wide spectrum of digital channels –> Deeper customer insights – enhanced Voice of the Customer (VOC) feedback
(2) Offer a wide array of preferred channels for customers to choose from, including real time unified communications –> Customer preference wins
(3) Creating and cultivating customer communities to foster interaction, and engagement through depth of resources –> Customer self service, value co-creation, open innovation
(4) Cultivating internal collaboration facilitates more nimble and accurate customer responses. –> Speedy access to people and information who can serve customer needs best
(5) Analytics across digital channels provides clues for customer journeys and expectations at each stage –> Deeper customer understanding paves the way for better product and service design, better marketing messaging and segmentation, and the crafting of a better customer experience.

How are you using or planning to use social and collaborative technology to enhance your customers’ experience? Would love to feature your stories here.

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

Global CEOs chart the course into unchartered waters for the Next Generation Enterprise

Outperformers Managing Change

Courtesy of Jay Cross http://www.flickr.com/photos/jaycross/6951344609/

The average time that a company spends in the S&P 500 is 15 years, continuously trending downward over the past 80 years. In fact, as recent as 10 years ago, the average lifespan was 25 years. Perhaps a decade from now, the average lifespan could be as short as 10 or maybe even 5 years. Change is swift. Cycle times are shortening. We are seeing this play out across industries and institutions.

These realities highlight an entirely new landscape which requires new methods of operation and engagement.

How are global CEO’s attempting to respond to this emerging reality?

In the recently published IBM Global Chief Executive Officer Study “Leading Through Connections”, some key insights emerged about where 1,700+ leaders from the worlds largest organizations intend to lead their organizations over the next few years.

Organizations of all sizes would benefit from taking note of these insights, primarily because the new era of connectedness enables any individual or organization in the global network to sense, analyze, and respond to create value, and exploit untapped opportunities.

Perhaps one of the most interesting findings of the study is that of all of the external forces that could impact their organization over the next 3 to 5 years, CEOs now see technology change as the most critical.

But the technology is simply an enabler and disruptor of the status quo. How CEOs envision leveraging and responding to emerging technology is where things get interesting.

Enabling and Extending Collaboration

In a fast moving world, fraught with uncertainty, four key traits stand out as critical for employee’s future success. Collaboration is the number-one trait CEOs are seeking in their employees, with 75 percent of CEOs calling it critical. People who are communicative, creative, and flexible will also find their skills in demand.

However placing these collaborative and creative folks into a rigid environment will likely lead to impeded growth and frustration. While hiring those with the key traits described above, CEO’s are simultaneously focused on building core organizational attributes. Placing a focus on ethics and values, and establishing a clear purpose and mission while evolving to a more collaborative environment are the primary hallmarks of the next generation enterprise, according to the survey.

The emphasis on openness and collaboration is even higher among outperforming organizations, and according to the study, they also have the change-management capabilities to make things happen.

Extending collaboration beyond traditional boundaries is a fast growing trend with more and more companies adopting the model that AG Lafley and Proctor & Gamble pioneered about a decade ago, leveraging the intelligence of a partnership community for innovation. Outperformers are more adept at leveraging the skllis and talents of folks outside of the organization. This is lending itself to the creation of new value chains, new revenue models, and in some cases, new industries.

Organizations that are building a collaborative culture internally and extending collaboration beyond organizational boundaries find themselves more nimble and able to change in a more dynamic world.

Increased Focus on the Customer

Throughout the report, there were several data points highlighting an even greater focus on understanding the customer.

When asked about key sources of sustained economic value, 66% of CEO’s highlighted customer relationships, finishing only to access to human capital.

When rating their own critical capabilities to lead their organization, guess what CEOs ranked as the most critical trait? “Customer Obsession”.

In addition, more than 7 out of 10 CEO’s are driving change within their respective organizations to “deepen the understanding of individual customer needs.

Big Data, Analytics, and Insights

I recently highlighted the importance of the data in this short little riff titled “What do you mean you don’t have the data?!?!?”

The data exhaust of digital interactions provides the framework to translate these growing mounds of raw data into meaningful insights, and ultimately translate those insights into action. This appears to be an increasingly important differentiator between organizations that thrive, and those that don’t. According to the data in the survey, insight driven organizations are about twice as competent than their underperforming peers at leveraging data.

Analytics investments are finding a sweet spot tying the increased focus on customers to the ability to harness insights from data. Smart organizations are doubling down on both trends as customer focused insights lead the way by a dramatic margin.

A recent study by McKinsey & Company had similar findings, heavily weighting the importance of customer insights.

Do CEO’s care about Social Media?

In what may have been the most surprising finding for me personally, when asked what they believe will be the top customer interaction methods within the next five years, CEO’s believe that social media will be second only to Face to Face. You’ll see in the chart below that digital interactions are the only customer interaction methods that are expected to grow. I wrote more about that topic here in a post titled “The Digitization of Human Interactions: From Long Tail to Mass Disruption”

Key challenges moving forward

Reality prevails. While frameworks, ideas, vision, and potential is being more widely grasped and understood, the task of redirecting generations of inertia and existing structures is more easily said than done. Below are some quoted sections from the report.

Globalization and increased connectedness have fundamentally changed how the world works. Like the rest of society, organizations are moving into an era of openness, characterized by individual empowerment, operational transparency and decentralized communications. For CEOs, it’s no longer a question of should the organization become more open and collaborative? But rather, it’s how do I run an open organization?

A few years into this journey, we’re collectively landing on similar whats. The most important question now is “How”?

As they do with most technology trends, CEOs are working to sift the social media hype from real opportunity. And skepticism is often intensified by fear. “We’re not yet comfortable that social media has matured to the point we’ll benefit more than we’ll suffer, explained an industrial products industry CEO from the United States. In a social media world, CEOs realize their brands are in the hands of customers and employees. Control is shifting from institutions to individuals.

When we can confidently prove that social has actually matured to the point where benefit clearly outweighs costs and/or risks, I believe progress will be achieved much faster. This is a great point. I know some of my readers have strong opinions on either side of this fence. I’d love to discuss this more in the comments below.

Believers are even unsure where to start. In the words of one Australian healthcare industry CEO, “Social media has grown faster than industry knowledge on how to use it.” And a life sciences industry CEO from Switzerland frankly admitted, “We are all scared to death about social media within our industry. We want to start with it. But we’re all just looking at each other, and nothing material is happening.”

This is consistent with my experience. How do we get from here to there with these resources, these systems, and these processes? The present and future states are still largely incongruent for many organizations.

The issue of change management takes a more primary role at this stage, not only to get from here to there, but actually in building a new and sustained core competency to constantly reinvent the organization in an environment that never stops changing, and likely will change at a more dramatic pace in the future.

In the IBM CEO study, 73% more outperformers demonstrated a successful track record of managing change.

This reality is also highlighted by the aforementioned McKinsey & Company research.

In summary, CEOs across the globe are both responding to and charting the course towards a more open and collaborative business environment.

The core competencies for individuals and organizations are the ability to sense, analyze, and respond in record time. Cultivating an open, dynamic and evolving culture, learning how to embrace change, an intense customer focus and a reliance on data driven insights are megathemes for the next several years. Survival of the fittest has never been more relevant.

This post was written as part of the IBM for Midsize Business program, which provides midsize businesses with the tools, expertise and solutions they need to become engines of a smarter planet.

Connections, Channels, and Collaboration: New Imperatives for Today’s CIO

Innovantage Logo

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

This week, I was reminded of an interesting stat that frames the current era in an interesting way.

We are indeed on a steady march towards global connectedness. Surprisingly, there is still a ways to go.

Only 32.7% of the world’s population has access to the internet, and only 17% have access via mobile device.

Connections and Collaboration

The trajectory is, however, exponentially marching towards real-time connection ability with anyone on the planet. As we gain greater capacity for connection, we are discovering dozens of new opportunities for collaboration. The implications are significant. Business models will be forced to evolve and new crowdsourcing and ad-hoc value chains will emerge.

Not only are we simply becoming more “connected”, the myriad of ways that we can connect are broadening as well – in our personal and professional lives, whether we are the customer, or whether we’re communicating with our customers. Additionally, as technology advances, we’ll be communicating with computers and machines more often, furhter adding to communications opportunities and challenges.

Next generation interactions will also include augmented reality applications and yet to be developed devices and the blending of physical and digital spaces.

In the end, all of these are simply enabling good old “Mind to Mind” and “Heart to Heart” communication. Past, current and future communication channels are simply props and mediums to facilitate the exchange of information, ideas, emotions, and solutions.

What is the impact on today’s CIO?

So then, what is the organization’s role in all of this? To facilitate, support, and leverage evolving communication channels to maximize the effectiveness of every interaction, internally and externally. (The lines between internal and external will continue to blur)

A growing argument is that the mass migration to the cloud is displacing IT resources. Like many of today’s roles, those (individuals and institutions) who don’t recognize and evolve with the current realities of the marketplace will likely be displaced. However, today’s CIO and his/her respective teams have plenty of critically significant work before them.

Their focus should include the following:

(1) Educating their organizations about potential benefits of the changing IT landscape
(2) Collaborating with their Line of Business counterparts to create new value streams
(3) Architecting platforms for interoperability to ensure that ecosystem participants have the right tools to communicate in the most effective fashion
(4) Assuring compliance with regulatory requirements
(5) Linking identities across networks and channels into one unified record
(6) Extracting insights from the interactions that take place across an ever evolving myriad of channels
(7) Building predictive models, leveraging multi-channel interaction data

Building and evolving the infrastructure to enable the next generation enterprise to operate with speed, agility, and flexibility should be towards the top of every CIO’s agenda. Enhancing communication and collaboration across the ecosystem sits smack dab in the middle of that priority.

This post is on behalf of the CIO Collaboration Network and Avaya

Toothpaste, toilet paper, white matter, and jam: Clues for better decision making

toothpaste

Several years ago, my wife and I ran out of toothpaste in a remote part of small Southeast Asian country. We spent half the day trying to find a place that carried a halfway recognizable form of packaged toothpaste. It was more of an adventure than you might imagine. We ultimately found one unopened Colgate toothpaste box covered in dust in a small bazaar kiosk. In that case, we were excited and thankful. It didn’t matter much that the box was a bit dusty, nor that it wasn’t our typical preferred choice of toothpaste.

I remember coming back to the United States several months later, and going shopping for toothpaste once again. I found myself paralyzed in the aisle as I tried to make sense of shelf space that looked similar to this:

Img Source http://throwyourselflikeseed.blogspot.com/

Too many choices

I remember hearing a story about an elderly woman in post communist USSR who stood crying in the aisle because she couldn’t choose the right kind of toilet paper. (Much of her previous life was spent often waiting in long lines for just one roll of the only toilet paper she had ever known). The sudden presentation of varying sizes, patterns, colors, and prices were overwhelming the underdeveloped analytical part of her brain.

In the era of Big Data, I believe that we all represent that woman to a certain extent. How many times, from a personal or corporate perspective, have you experienced some level of stress or anxiety because of the amount of information you have to sift through in order to make the right decision?

We’re increasingly overwhelmed. When we type something into Google, we don’t want 4,456,761 results.

When we are making purchasing decisions, Google found in 2011 that the average shopper uses 10.4 sources of information to make a purchasing decision (nearly double the number of sources they used in 2010).

To illustrate the point, Sheena Iyengar of Columbia University, who has dedicated much of her life to analyzing the concept of making choices, ran a study by placing a free tasting booth in a grocery store.

First they offered 6 different jams. 40% of the customers stopped to taste. 30% of those bought some.

A week later, they set up the same booth in the same store, but this time with 24 different jams. 60% of the customers stopped to taste. But only 3% bought some.

*** Having too many choices made them 10 times less likely to buy. ***

To complicate matters even further, we now can get this information from a variety of screens, and devices. A recent study of a small sample of 20 somethings found that they switched media screens 27 times in an hour!

How many choices do we want?

According to Iyengar, “when humans are given 10 or more choices, they make bad decisions”.

Perhaps that’s why marketers have been trying for so long to get on the first page of search engines. Jeff Bullas shared the following results from an AOL study on search.

The first ranking position in the search results receives 42.25% of all click-through traffic
The second position receives 11.94%
Third position on the first page obtains 8.47%
The fourth placed position on page one receives 6.05%
The others on the first page are under 5% of click through traffic
The first ten results (page one ) received 89.71% of all click-through traffic.

Writers, content producers, and other media have long known that “Top 10″ lists attract eyeballs and attention. People crave simplicity they can digest and manage from an authoritative source.

The typical American makes about 70 decisions per day. 50% of CEO decisions are made in 9 minutes or less, and less than 12% take more than an hour to make.

We collectively spend a alot of time not just trying to gather and analyze information to help inform the decisions we are making, but trying to absorb the information that comes at us unexpectedly, where we are not directing the stream of content.

But, this is taking its toll.

ForensicPsychology.net found that “heavy internet users are 2.5 times more likely to be depressed and that they also suffer from a reduction in white matter in their brains (goo that transmits signals around the cerebrum) in the emotion, memory, sensory, and speech centers by 20%”

Enabling better decision making

Big Data brings with it a whole set of opportunities, but also challenges. According to IBM, 90% of the data in human history was created in the last 2 years. According to McKinsey&Company, that pace will be accelerating at a pace of 40% per year.

Design and creativity take an increasingly important role in the process.

From the hyperlinked article above:

Advances in technology – faster, more powerful,less expensive – are concrete and visible. Design is subtle, more subjective, more open to human interpretation. But, as our increasingly advanced technologies enable us to build larger, more capable, more complex systems, the role of design becomes ever more important. It is the only way to ensure that our technologies will help us deal with our increasingly hectic lives.

The challenge then for marketers, product managers, salespeople, customer service, consultants, advisors, designers of products, services, and experiences, and anyone else who is initiating or sustaining progress is to take all of this data and information, and translate it into a digestible, understandable, and insightful menu of choices for their audience.

Regardless of your industry, your customers (along with your executives, your partners, and other stakeholders) will likely resonate with the following statement.

“Help me make sense of everything that is happening. Help me know what to pay attention to. Surface a narrowly defined selection of the things that most closely align with my needs, desires, and jobs to be done. Help me evaluate quickly pros and cons of each decision, and then help me make the best decision.”

Organizations of all sizes that are able to center their focus on answering that call from their customers will thrive.

So, then, let’s get to work. But I know..it’s much easier said than done.

This post was written as part of the IBM for Midsize Business program, which provides midsize businesses with the tools, expertise and solutions they need to become engines of a smarter planet.