May 24, 2013

IBM Watson enters the realm of customer engagement

While I get to see and hear about hundreds of product announcements, this one is particularly interesting. The race to leverage computing power to synthesize incredibly huge amounts of disparate data in real time to meet the needs of customer demands is the next frontier of customer relations.

Today at the IBM Smarter Commerce Global Summit in Nashville, Tennessee, IBM plans to launch the Watson Engagement Advisor, aimed at helping organizations provide better customer service and product recommendations in real time at scale. The same technology that once outsmarted humans to win Jeopardy and has recently been used to diagnose cancer will now be used to help organizations sense and respond in real time.

From CNBC:

Big Blue announced five new clients working on using Watson’s cognitive computing and ability to crunch so-called big data, to help enhance service to their customers. The companies include Malaysia telecom provider Celcom, financial firms Royal Bank of Canada and ANZ Banking Group, IT services provider IHS, and the consumer research firm Nielsen.

“We’ll be exploring ways to use Watson for helping our agencies and their client brands engage more effectively with consumers across all devices—from TV to tablet to smartphone,” wrote Randall Beard, chief of Advertiser Solutions at Nielsen.

While it still seems early, this area is certainly something to watch.

Location Revisited: Marketing’s cornerstone takes on a new paradigm

foursquare_map

Location, location, location.

The concept immediately brings back to mind college marketing classes and textbooks; clear lessons from industrial age distribution models. The focus has slowly faded away, however, over the past couple of decades with the invention and growth of a digitally connected, flat economy in which we can buy anything… from anyone… from anywhere.

Except… for most of us, where we are is actually a huge driver of what we do. Mitch Lieberman, has recently been placing more emphasis on context. For a few years now, I’ve heard and seen statements floating by my activity streams like “Content is king, but context is queen”. Robert Scoble and Shel Israel are in the process of writing about the “Age of Context”.

They’ve all picked up on the fact that we’re moving from an era of BIG, CRUDE, AND MANUAL TO SMALL, MEASURED, AND AUTOMATIC.

All of us, in our personal and professional lives, are desiring requiring more relevance, more alignment, and more accurate filters to help us navigate the bombardment of information we encounter in our daily lives.

Relevance. Context. All of a sudden, location matters again. Though, it’s contribution to customer behavior is manifesting itself in a different manner.

Even with the dramatic rise of e-commerce, most consumers still purchase from brick and mortar stores. According to a 2012 study:

Though consumers are using their mobile devices more than ever to find deals and research products, they still love their brick-and-mortar stores, a new study shows. Despite the proliferation of devices, shopping applications and growing consumer comfort with the mobile channel, the vast majority (90 percent) of both online and offline shoppers involve a store visit in many of their purchases.

Until recently, e-commerce and brick and mortar business models have been largely detached. Even for many major retailers, stock, pricing, returns were not connected. That era is giving way to a connected experience where consumers interact with brands across channels (brick and mortar, 3rd party retail, e-commerce, social), with the increased expectation of a unified experience across them all.

If I’m at the beach, please don’t send me an offer about printer cartridges. If I’m out to dinner, an offer about a local gelateria is much more likely to get opened than an email about gardening services.

A growing sea of online technology companies allow our location patterns and habits to be tracked (and hopefully used for mutually beneficial purposes).

Companies like Facebook, Foursquare, and Yelp allow users to check in, sharing with their network where they are. At the same time, they’re also sharing their information with a growing cadre of location based advertisers. By knowing which areas consumers frequent, more relevant ads can arguably be served. In addition to understanding the sum total of checkins and locations, patterns can be detected, and psychographic, sociographic, and demographic profiles can arguably be constructed to recommend offers that are relevant based on previous behavior.

foursquare_map

Some consumers can’t be bothered with checking in, however. It takes time, effort, and giving away information to “big brother in the sky” isn’t all that appealing to most people, especially when there’s limited value in return.

Other emerging startups like PlaceMe, Banjo, Sonar, Friday, and Highlight automatically tracks your whereabouts and the whereabouts of others near you, offering serendipitous and/or more targeted “people discovery” opportunities.

But, without opting in or participating in any of the above, those little smartphones in our pockets are already tracking and providing plenty of information to the mobile platform vendors and application providers.

This controversial 2010 Wall Street Journal article highlighting an interview with Google’s Eric Schmidt provides clues related to role location plays in the future of context, commerce, and marketing.

“I actually think most people don’t want Google to answer their questions,” he elaborates. “They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next.”

Let’s say you’re walking down the street. Because of the info Google has collected about you, “we know roughly who you are, roughly what you care about, roughly who your friends are.” Google also knows, to within a foot, where you are. Mr. Schmidt leaves it to a listener to imagine the possibilities: If you need milk and there’s a place nearby to get milk, Google will remind you to get milk. It will tell you a store ahead has a collection of horse-racing posters, that a 19th-century murder you’ve been reading about took place on the next block.

Merging location data with transaction data

Until now, the emerging benefit and value of location data has struggled to find it’s legs in a meaningful way. However, when I was offered a discount on a purchase from American Express last year if I connected my AMEX account to my foursquare account, I immediately saw the benefit for AMEX. They already know what I spend money on. If they also know where I go, they can find all sorts of things out about me.

  • What % of my spending do I put on my AMEX card?
  • By merging transaction, demographic, and geogrpahic behavior patterns, they can begin to construct a psycho-graphic and/or deeper socio-graphic profile of me
  • By understanding who I am connected to and/or communicating with, they can potentially begin to understand purchasing behaviors within my network
  • Finally: the unknown. Like many emerging big data initiatives, finding unforeseen patterns in data models can provide new unforeseen opportunities.

Even without real time location data, merging data collected from the digital realm with other data sets presents new opportunities for contextual marketing. From AllThingsD:

Ticketmaster is doing all the normal stuff you’d expect to help users share with each other when they buy tickets to events. But it’s also the only partner that I saw mashing up multiple Open Graph applications.
If you listen to music on an Open Graph application like Spotify, Ticketmaster automatically detects (with your permission) and tells you when those artists are next playing in your town. Usually these apps depend on which artists you “Like” or explicitly follow. It seems smart to use real, dynamic listening data to figure this out.

VinTank is working on a technology that indexes preferences and buying behavior of premium wine lovers, sends alerts to wineries in Napa Valley when a potential fit for their products are nearby, allowing them to send a message or offer that should offer high appeal for that person.

However, Jack Dorsey’s Square, which is in the process of disrupting the world’s commerce payment systems, is approaching location based marketing from the opposite end of the spectrum, and thinks they’ll actually be able to make location more useful. While many first generation location apps vendors know where you are and perhaps what you’ve done, they typically don’t have any data on what you purchased. It’s the merging of location, transaction, and social data that some might describe as the next holy grail. Creating a recommendation engine based on financial transactions, and using location as a contextual filter for commercial transactions holds significant promise.

Deeper customer understanding at the center

At the center of customer focused innovation is understanding your customers better.Understanding where people go, and what they buy when they’re there will be a significant input for next generation commerce.

The data being collected by the payment gateways (Mastercard, Visa, American Express, Square, PayPal, GoPayment) is arguably more valuable than the transaction fees they are collecting. More intelligence is being built in to the purchase and sales cycles, respectively, and at the center of both sides are recommendation engines. Consumers are coming to expect Amazon.com-like suggestions that make their life easier and shorten the investment of discovery and analysis.

Understanding transactional and behavioral patterns and merging them together will arguably allow marketers to offer more precise offers and interactions based on a deeper understanding of their customer’s current context.

  • How is your organization leveraging location data?
  • What are the primary barriers you see?
  • How will privacy issues come in to play as technology advances?
This post was written as part of the IBM for Midsize Business program, which provides midsize businesses with the tools, expertise and solutions they need to become engines of a smarter planet. I’ve been compensated to contribute to this program, but the opinions expressed in this post are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.



How to write copy that goes viral: Advice from Seth Godin

Seth Godin does a phenomenal job of providing insights. Below is something he wrote that I wish I did, but I’ll be saving this and committing it to memory. In many ways, it’s marketing 101, but the clarity with which it’s presented is something every marketer can benefit from

From Seth’s Blog:

The best approach is to not try to write things that will go viral.

No, the best approach is to write for just one person. Make an impact on just one person. Even better, make it so they can’t sleep that night unless they choose to make a difference for just one other person by sharing your message with them.

The rest will take care of itself.

The era of asking great questions

Laos Villagers

I’ll never forget meeting some people in a remote village of Laos (Southeast Asia) a few years ago. The village had no electricity. Not only was it a journey across culture and geography, but a journey back in time. Our translator helped us to ask about how they lived. They told us how they farmed, harvested, dried, and prepared rice manually. They made fishing nets with their hands, and fished with their handmade fishing poles from their hand made boats as they rose and slept along with the sun. We finally asked if they had any questions for us and there were just blank stares. It struck me as odd. There were no questions.

LaosVillagers

Were they shy, embarrassed, indifferent? Was it a cultural thing that I wasn’t aware of? Here we were, with skin colors, and eye colors that had rarely been seen, from a land on the other side of the planet (which may have well been on the other side of the Universe), with clothes and technology and language that was largely unfamiliar, and there were no questions!

The era of asking great questions

We’ve known for centuries that asking great questions (and finding the answers) is core component of innovation. Entire fields like physics and psychology have been developed because people started asking questions that needed to be answered. That’s nothing new and there’s plenty that’s been written about the importance of asking great questions.

But, we’ve never before been able to ask and answer questions as fast as we can today.

  • What is my friend in India doing right now?
  • Who do my friends know that I know?
  • What the best selling widget is in a category I’ve never heard of until today?
  • How long it will take me to get from any address in the United States to the Rapid City Regional airport based on current traffic conditions?
  • Who currently lives in San Francisco that is from Laguna Beach?

Here’s a partial answer that I found to that last question via facebook in about 10 seconds:

LB_SFO

We’re all being faced with an increasing array of new problems to solve on a path that hasn’t necessarily been traveled before. Google helps me get up to speed in minutes on words and concepts I’ve never even heard of before. Problem solving is a central competency of today’s knowledge workers.

New landscape. New questions.

What’s interesting is that discovering the answers to age old secrets isn’t the only new frontier that’s opening. As technology advances, new uses are being invented on the fly by the marketplace. Never before have customers had the capability to be standing in a store, holding a product, and checking prices offered by that same store and a million others online in real time, while instantaneously getting feedback from friends and hundreds of strangers at the same time.

Simultaneously, product and service vendors have unprecedented access to watch prospects and customers interact with products, media properties, and people, en masse, in real time.

Job requirements and roles continue to evolve, at a faster pace. We all face this and organizations of all types and sizes are racing to keep up. But solving the problems you’re faced with reactively, and identifying new opportunities by creatively thinking about what could be is perhaps even more important, and more rare.

Asking new, creative, and unique questions is the key to unlocking new value for your organization. As markets shift and evolve and a new landscape comes into view, those that are asking the best questions have the opportunity to find the best answers.

Since answers to the questions of yesteryear can now often be answered in seconds, perhaps it’s time to ask a new set of questions. Questions that would have been impossible to answer or preposterous to ask just a decade ago.

  • Can cells heal themselves?
  • Can machines create new products by themselves?
  • What happens if the world moves away from a fiat banking system?
  • What patterns exist across domains that we thought were previously disconnected?

Why do we make enough food to give everyone on the planet 2,617 calories a day, but almost a billion people are hungry right now? Why can’t we change that?

The rapidly growing fields of Nanotechnology, bioinformatics, neuromedicine, augmented reality; None of these would be possible if someone wasn’t asking great questions.

What’s your most preposterous question?

What’s the most preposterous question you’d like to ask, but have never dared to ask it? Perhaps when you type in the comments below, it will be the first time you’ve ever thought to ask. Ask it, and then let’s sort out the answers together.

This post was written as part of the IBM for Midsize Business program, which provides midsize businesses with the tools, expertise and solutions they need to become engines of a smarter planet. I’ve been compensated to contribute to this program, but the opinions expressed in this post are my own and don’t necessarily represent IBM’s positions, strategies or opinions.



When our Neurons are Connected to the Net

Neuron Culture

Image Credit Urbagram.net

Not too long ago, I was having a casual but meaningful digital conversation with a couple of gentlemen that I respect. They both have large networks, good street cred, and active digital profiles.

I asked the question: “Who are the top 3 people you respect in “the space”?

The response from one was thoughtful and quick. 3 names with brief reasons why.  I benefited as relational capital and intelligence were quickly transferred. It was one interaction in a regular stream of sharing between us. I quickly found each of the mentioned names online.  None of them have high digital influence scores, nor significantly active social profiles or presences. However, I began following them and evaluating some of the work and comments of theirs that was able to find.

Quickly I recognized that this was influence in action. Someone I knew, respected, and trusted had given me a gift, pointed me in a new direction, and even though in just a very small way, had changed my behavior for a few minutes, and perhaps my scope of view and thinking for a longer period of time.

What I also recognized that this interaction was not visible to any of today’s “influence ranking” systems like Klout, PeerIndex, Kred, or the recently released Little Bird.

I shared this observation with my two friends and asked “Will we ever have the technology to connect the dots between what just happened and true influence?”  My other colleague quickly replied “when our neurons are connected to the net”.

But will we need to wait that long?

  • Are the reputation systems of today void of any value at all?
  • What if I don’t want everything I do and everyone I know to be available for consumption and analysis?
  • If I opt out, will I essentially be opting out of future society?

The concept introduces a whole slew of new considerations, opportunities, and privacy and transparency concerns.

Om Malik riffs in a recent post:

At present we rank photos, rate restaurants, like or dislike brands, retweet things we love. But if this idea of collaborative consumption takes hold — and I have no reason to think it won’t — we will be building a quantified society. We will be ranking real humans. The freelance workers — like the Uber drivers and Postmates couriers — are getting quantified. The best ones will continue to do well, but what about the others, the victims of this data darwinism? Do they have any protection or any rights?

We continue to leverage machines to help us to our jobs better. We continue to teach them more and more – how to reason and think like a human. The traditional response is that it can never be done. But IBM Watson‘s jeopardy perhaps requires us to take a deeper look and do a closer analysis. It is predicted that in just a few years, the processing power of IBM Watson will be contained in the size of a smartphone. We can and likely will have a super human intelligent friend with us.  What is worthy of world wide fame and media coverage today may arguably be just part of human existence in just a few years. We’ve seen this pattern continually reinforce itself repeatedly over shorter and shorter time horizons over the last few decades.

Some will quickly reply that Watson is capable of finding facts, but the things that make us uniquely human, namely emotions;  Being funny, being sexy, being loving, these are very complicated and intelligent behaviors may forever be separated from the realm of machines.

It’s a reasonable argument and one I currently subscribe to, but there is a dissenting argument that perhaps emotions are simply the highest form of humanity, may also be able to be taught and learned by machines.  In fact, Ray Kurzweil predicts that in less than 20 years, computers will be capable and will perhaps surpass a full range of human capabilities.

This computer is thousands of times more powerful than the computer I used as a student, and it’s 100,000 times smaller. In 25 years, it will be a billion times more powerful in price performance, a billion times more powerful per dollar, and 100,000 times smaller.

It’ll be the size of a blood cell. They’ll be going through our body and keeping us healthy from the inside.

Not as futuristic as it sounds. People have already been doing that in animal models. There are people walking around with computers attached to their brains, like Parkinson’s patients, the latest generation of which allows you to download new software to the computer that’s connected into your brain from outside the patient. Right now that requires surgery because it’s pea-sized. But it will be blood-cell-size in 25 years, and we will be able to introduce it noninvasively.

We’re collectively on a unprecedented journey that surely holds unprecedented disruption and opportunity for individuals and organizations alike. We’re about to witness the next experiment be unleashed as Google Glass begins shipping to early adopters in the coming weeks. If you haven’t seen it, the video below provides a 2 minute preview of what’s possible today along the road to deeper human and technology integration.

  • What will these changes mean for your personal life?
  • What new opportunities are being unlocked for your organization?
  • How can you leverage the deeper integration between technology and humans to understand your customers better and deliver superior experiences for them?
  • What are the biggest barriers to leveraging these new technologies, internally and for your customer base?

Learning from New Orleans: Microsoft’s opportunity for the future

New Orleans Storm by Deborah Hurd

New Orleans Storm by Deborah Hurd

New Orleans Storm by Deborah Hurd

It takes nearly 15 minutes to walk from one end to the other of the over 1,000,000+ square foot Ernest N. Morial Convention Center in New Orleans.  The conference center provided a fitting metaphor for both the breadth of Microsoft’s offerings and  the distance that Microsoft Dynamics CRM has covered over the past two years.

Walking through the French Quarter, and through the halls of the convention center during Microsoft’s 2013 Convergence conference, I had the ability to listen, observe, and have conversations with Microsoft executives, customers, partners, and prospects about what they’re working on and what they’re looking for.

Microsoft Dynamics CRM now boasts more than 3 million users and more than 39,000 customers.  They are making progress on their cloud offerings and providing a growing mix of mobile capabilities. The announcements around the new release of the recently acquired Marketing Resource Management (MRM) / Marketing Automation tool Marketing Pilot and its CRM connector, plus the social listening vendor NetBreeze acquisition hints that they’re dedicated to continuing to improve their suite of capabilities. While the new capabilities are triggering increased demand and inquiries, Microsoft is still working on understanding and defining use cases, as most customers appear to still be wrestling with trying to understand exactly what’s possible with these new tools and capabilities.

Chargrilled Oysters, Jambalaya, and Gumbo

On Tuesday night, I had New Orleans chargrilled oysters for the first time at the ACME Oyster House.  They were magical, unexpected, and delicious.  So good, that I had more on Wednesday night.  This is what happens when the right ingredients come together in the right set of conditions.  Like Jambalaya, Gumbo, and other Creole cuisine, good ingredients transform into something amazing when mixed together in a perfect blend.

And in many ways, this is a fitting analogy for the potential that Microsoft has before them. There is a growing list of high quality ingredients: Dynamics CRM, AX, GP, NAV, coupled with Skype, Lync, Yammer, Azure, Sharepoint, SQL Server, Office, Windows 8, Surface, NetBreeze, Marketing Pilot, etc.  Each of them has a good value proposition on their own.

But  all ingredients have a development lifecycle. Oysters need to grow, be harvested, shucked. Cheese starts with milk, and needs to aged and pasteurized. Garlic needs to be grown, harvested, peeled, chopped. A fire needs to be built, stoked, and managed to just the right temperature.

In the same way, all of the Microsoft ingredients are still on their path. The raw ingredients themselves are still being refined.

AX appears to be coming along and growing quickly, making inroads into the enterprise. CRM is morphing and trying to be the unifying fabric of many capabilities and customer information, also moving upstream and improving their value proposition for organizations of all sizes.

Skype and Lync are merging, improving their independent capabilities while trying to imagine how an integrated solution might make things even better.   Azure is growing and still trying to find its footing in the fast growing world of cloud infrastructure.  Windows 8 is moving along and keeping Microsoft incumbents happy.  The Surface is likely powerful enough to keep Windows enthusiasts happy and progressive but I am not sure if they will eat significantly into those that have a growing loyalty and commitment towards Apple and Android platforms.

As stand alones, they are solid.  In most of their respective categories, the Microsoft offering is almost always considered as one of the top 3 vendors to consider.

But again, it is the perfect construction, assembly, presentation, and delivery where the magic happens. This is Microsoft’s real opportunity, where they haven’t begun to realize their full potential here.

Restless

New Orleans is also the cradle of Jazz, Blues, and Swing Music, yet another powerful metaphor for taking good elements (in this case notes and sounds) and placing them together in perfect harmony to create an amazingly beautiful sound and experience. In a fast moving business and technology landscape, this may be an even better metaphor than incredible fusion cuisine to describe today’s current reality.

Improvisation is central to Jazz and today’s fast moving business climate requires consistent innovation. In a 1988 interview, trombonist J. J. Johnson said, “Jazz is restless. It won’t stay put and it never will.”  This statement could clearly be applied to the fast moving technology world, and as technology penetrates deeper and deeper into the core functions of business and society, it is safe to say this is true for all of our respective personal and organizational lives.

The Road Ahead

Microsoft did a really nice job with their event. Highlighting their customers’ stories, integrating live music into their keynotes, and evangelizing a story of unity across  roles, functions, and domains.  It resonated and received praise from the attendees.

Kirill Tatarinov, President of Microsoft Business Solutions Division, effectively highlighted the current business environment and the accomplishments of the division over the past 12 months.  He spoke in a compelling narrative of democratizing opportunity through providing tools to compete in a new economy, seemingly building on the legacy of Microsoft in the early days when they made productivity applications widely available through the innovations of Windows and Office.

The event was themed “The Road Ahead”, and while they executed well, I didn’t get a clear sense of what the road ahead is going actually going to be, or how well Microsoft understands where things are going. However, the journey that Microsoft is on is all of a sudden more interesting and compelling than it has been for a while.

If Microsoft can continue to innovate, increase their pace along its current trajectory, and focus on creating magic through the integration of great ingredients, notes, and rhythms, there is actually potential for them to re-establish the brand as an innovative technology leader. Some of the dust has actually already begun to be blow off through their fast growing consumer devices and their recent innovations and acquisitions.

Providing a greater ability for their customers to identify opportunities, and respond with agility in a fast moving era, Microsoft should aspire to the second incarnation of “The Big Easy”.

 
Disclosure: My travel expenses and conference registration was paid for by Microsoft and they are a client. I have received no request or remuneration for this post and these are my candid views based on my research and experience.

 

 

 

Is the customer always right?

If we truly believe in customer “relationships”, then the concept that the customer is always right is unfortunately flawed, because very few people are ALWAYS right. Customers can be irrational, selfish, irresponsible, and even unprofitable.

As in any relationship, sometimes there is mis-alignment of expectations and lack of a compelling value proposition for both sides. The opportunity for value exchange changes and evolves over time. The duty of an organization is to continually listen, show empathy, gain a deeper understanding of needs and jobs, and provide a product or service offering that provides significant value for their customers, or better yet, provide a platform for customers to co-create their own products and services, and support each other in their mutual journeys and jobs to be done.

To fail to recognize that some customers are simply unprofitable is to deny the truth. In some cases, it may make sense for the organization, in their best interest and in duty to their shareholders to first attempt to re-establish relational guidelines in order to achieve a better balance for both parties, or in some cases, even “fire customers”.

Understand that the context I am speaking of is one of an endless and tireless pursuit to create value, to delight customers, and to create a community of engaged, happy, and enthusiastic customers. The reality is that each of our respective organizations won’t be a fit for some customers.

In service to those who are engaged, it may make sense to re-allocate human capital away from those who are unprofitable for the organization towards better servicing those who are.

Before anyone screams at me about how customers are about more than profits for the organization, I agree. The challenge is that profits today are only measured in monetary currency. These current limitations ignore things like referral value, or recommendation value.

In short, it’s important to listen, serve, and respect customers. However, not all relationships are equal nor mutually beneficial.

What will CRM look like over the next 5 years? Software Advice Interview Highlights

Innovantage Logo

Ashley Verrill – a expert with CRM reviewer SoftwareAdvice.com – interviewed me recently for the second edition of CRM’s Next 5 in 5. This report was an update from predictions five of my industry cohorts made about technologies that will change CRM in the next five years. Special thanks to Ashley for the conversation and for providing the edited snapshot of our discussion below:

Ashley: You’ve talked a lot about how the importance of advancements relative to contextualizing CRM — such as Mobile, Big Data and Social – are a little over amplified (though still important). From your perspective, are there any products or services out there that have actually made real innovation and change to how we use CRM systems?

Brian: Digital networks have significantly transformed how we as people interact with other people, information, and increasingly devices and machines. More and more of our lives are moving into the digital realm. Where we are. What we are doing. Who we know. What we say or think or like. The technologies that capitalize on this increasing wealth of information are the ones that will endure past the hype. These innovators will advance our capabilities in three primary ways:

  • One, they will elevate our prospect and customer discovery capabilities via Linkedin, Twitter, GooglePlus and other niche social communities. These services listen for conversations from those that might be interested in your products or services.
  • Next, we should expect significant advancements around harnessing data for customer understanding and deeper segmentation. These products aggregate digital and social signals with profile information to provide an added layer of context and the opportunity for new market segments. I also know of a few organizations that are experimenting with using social influence to prioritize customer service response.
  • Finally, I see huge opportunity in the customer communities space. Companies like Lithium, BazaarVoice, Get Satisfaction, and Jive are a few enabling such brand-owned communities. Despite mixed fanfare, there are plenty of case studies proving return on investment through reduced customer service costs, increased word-of-mouth marketing, and invaluable insights from listening to thousands of interactions.

 

Ashley: In the past, you’ve talked about how these trends are bubbling up around the edges. What’s stopping them from becoming mainstream now?

Brian: Organizations and individuals are wrestling just to understand what’s happening, let alone adopt. We’ve never had access to so much data about everything – from weather patterns, to location data, to spending habits, to internet browsing behavior. The reality of it is that most of it is just noise and not useful to us. So, as quickly as we race to gather data, we realize it’s hard to filter, and it’s hard to aggregate into meaningful ways.

 

Ashley: So are saying it’s more of a cultural gap that technical?

Brian: There is a disconnect between the way organizations have worked for the last 80 or 100 years and what’s increasingly possible. In general, few organizations are built to identify, consider, plan, and take actions that fully leverage these new capabilities. They work under an industrial age model which requires relatively static models of research, investments, and feedback loops, a stark contrast to a real time, agile, flat organization model that is continually in a state of evolution. The retrenching and adoption often requires new management structures, new people, new mindsets. It’s disruptive and disruptive is not always convenient or beneficial.

In most situations, we’re talking about significant shifts in culture, management practices, processes. It will take some time.

 

Ashley: : You wrote an article about optimizing the full spectrum of customer interactions. Have you seen technologies yet that effectively enable this sort of communication optimization?

Brian: I’ve yet to see any technology that can do this the way it should be done. There are many that are seeking to build, but many from an analog / pre-digital revolution core. In addition, many organizations are just now still trying to merge interactions across channels.

Merging web with phone and email for many organizations is still quite a challenge, as it means combining data from five, ten, or even 25 customer databases. Most companies that I’ve seen make progress in this regard have a central hub that gathers all data into a unified profile and enables multi-channel communication from there.

 

Ashley: So are there any innovators in this space you see?

Brian: Look at what Google is doing with Google Now. They are merging experiences across screens and channels and venturing into the world of predictive analytics, surfacing information that you may not even be aware that you want.

Recently, information taken from my Google searches or web activity or my email threads are leading to contextual “cards” showing up on my Android phone. Anything with a digital footprint can be tracked. Remember, as more and more of our lives take place digitally, the potential to create compelling and unified omni-channel experiences becomes more pronounced.

 

Ashley: I wasn’t as convinced by this prediction in last year’s CRM’s 5 in 5, but Lauren wrote about Brent Leary’s opinions that CRM integration with television was on the horizon. Have you seen any advancements on this front?

Brian: There are a lot of studies coming out about dual screening or multi-screening. People are sharing, reading, researching, playing games while watching TV. That is a fact at this point and I believe the trend is here to stay. If you consider all that the web has been able to do with cookies and other tracking technology, the re-targeting ad market, google’s relevant search results, it’s not much of a stretch to imagine that same thing on another screen with media.

 

Ashley: What form do you see this interactivity taking in the next few years?

Brian: Over the next few years, I believe we’ll see more and more interactive integration with TV’s and the continued evolution of Smart TVs. Seeing what your neighborhood, city, friends are watching, optionally tracking their comments on the TV itself and/or your connected device is likely coming.

 

Ashley: Sounds like Spotify for television. How does this translate into a business opportunity?

Brian: Obviously when content producers and advertisers gain access to this data about what you are watching and sharing with friends, they can build and present more relevant content and offers. Think like Netflix and Amazon’s suggested titles or “what to watch next.” This will start with contextualized ads, then evolve to include product placement. I’d say it’s inevitable.

 

Ashley: Last year and again this year, we talked a lot about unified communications with Paul Greenberg. He believes Microsoft is really the only player that could make an effective move on this front by combining Skype, Sharepoint, Assure, and their other communication properties.

Do you agree with Paul that Microsoft is the only one that could potentially make this UC move, but won’t this year?

Brian: I’m not sure that I agree that Microsoft is in the lead here. Maybe in the context of today’s major CRM players, that is a true statement. But companies like Cisco and Avaya and other telecommunications are far ahead on some of those enterprise class technologies. Google is another one to watch out for. Gmail and Google Apps continues to grow, with GooglePlus and Hangouts. They are moving into that foray in a very interesting way with most people not aware of where this could go.

The others are just a couple of acquisitions away from making a play in the UC space, which I’ll likely write more about soon.

 

Ashley: Last year, we quoted Brian Solis talking about how gamification will move beyond marketing for loyalty. In the past year, I’ve seen a lot of development in gamification as far as using it with social enterprise apps to foster collaboration, which is something you’ve also talked about.

What specific technologies have made the most headway in gamifying the social business in the past year?

Brian: I think gamification is a widely misunderstood and misused term. At it’s core, it’s simply about incentivizing human behavior. Bunchball and Badgeville are clearly the two leaders in this emerging space, especially as it relates to incentivizing behaviors on internal social networking platforms. I do think that we’re in for a lot of trial and error here.

 

Ashley: Why do you say trial and error? What still needs to be figured out?

Brian: In my observation, it seems that we’re still a ways off from identifying and incentivizing real valuable digital actions. Most of the case studies that I’ve seen to date are simply incentivizing participation, which is a start, but not very meaningful in the long run. When you’re talking about human behavior, there are a lot of psychological and sociological factors at play. Most technologists and even managers likely don’t have the domain knowledge they need to leverage gamification techniques to the extent that they could.

As I laid out in the post you referred to, I believe there’s plenty of opportunity to begin to present the right challenges to the right people and incentivize them to take the proper actions.

 

Ashley: Finally, are there other innovations we haven’t talked about that you seeing changing CRM as we know it in the next five years?

Brian: I think we’ll see more automation in general. We’re seeing this become more mainstream from a marketing perspective. The ability to track behaviors and create a series of if/then trees that help to to move prospects along the customer journey will likely continue to play a more important role over the next few years. Extending the data set to multiple channels will lead to more discovery about customer behavior, and how to respond in a way that resonates.

At the same time, I expect we’ll likely see continued focus on understanding and improving the customer experience. In a world that quickly races towards commoditization, “experience” becomes more important for customer loyalty, retention, and mindshare.

 

Ashley: What about the “X” Factor. What’s still unknown that could inhibit any of these developments?

Brian: Security and privacy are big unknowns in all of these things that we’re talking about and may be the single biggest factor in changing the trajectory of how we as a society and as corporate citizens adopt and implement these new emerging technologies.

Everybody’s talking about Customer Experience. Customers still not getting what they need.

Performance_Gap

Lots of executives, marketers, customer service folks say they work for a customer focused organization. They say they care about the customer experience. According to a myriad of research reports, blogs, tweets, podcasts, and whitepapers, I see an increased focused on customer focus, customer experience, customer engagement, customer intimacy, etc. etc.

This is undoubtedly the right direction, and frankly the only direction for corporate survival and growth, in my opinion. A key and often underrepresented component of developing meaningful and profitable customer relationships is TRUST. I’ve written more about that here.

So how are we collectively doing being customer focused? Do “what we say” and “what we do” actually line up?

According to the latest edition of the Edelman Trust Barometer, the Top 5 Trust Building Attributes between companies and customers are:

1. Offers high quality products and services
2. Listens to customer needs and feedback
3. Treats employees well
4. Places customers ahead of profits
5. Takes responsible actions to address an issue or a crisis.

In the latest CEO Survey by PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 82% of the CEOs in the survey said they were going to spend time changing their customer strategies in 2013.

That’s good, because below is a chart from the Edelman Trust Barometer showing that the drivers of trust and the perceived performance of businesses to achieve that trust are miles apart.

Performance_Gap

Imagine that you walked into your individual performance review and you got 3s 4s, and 5s on a 10 point scale across the board. That’s essentially what we collectively just received from our customers.

Are you shocked? Surprised? Upset? Ready to take action? Perhaps you’re saying that “that doesn’t apply to us”.

Many of you are probably moving into action as you read this. “We’ve got to do better. We’ve got to ask our customers what we can do better!” Great. But before you build and send out that next customer survey, please consider reading the following from a recent article in the Harvard Business Review (emphasis added is mine):

The great majority of the decisions we make in our information-overloaded, distraction-heavy lives are made outside our conscious awareness, driven more by contexts than cognitions. As a result, asking someone to pinpoint what will influence them in the future is a bit like saying, “tell me how you will behave in the future when you are not thinking about what I have just asked you about?”

Behavioural scientists Wes Schultz and Robert Cialdini provide compelling evidence of why asking people to predict what will influence their future decisions and behaviors is so often ineffective. In one set of studies, they asked several hundred homeowners in California to predict which of four messages would be most successful at persuading them to take steps to conserve energy and reduce their overall consumption. The four messages were 1) conserving energy helps the environment; 2) conserving energy protects future societies; 3) conserving energy saves you money; 4) many of your neighbors are already conserving energy.

Those shown the message about what their neighbors were doing rated it as the least likely to influence their behaviours. Yet when meter readings were taken, the researchers discovered that this was the most effective message when it came to changing behavior even though this same message was rejected by most as having any sway. Even though most will deny its effect, our desire to keep up with the Joneses is both universal and automatic. For example, recent studies have shown that compared to the usual approach of threatening those who fail to pay their taxes on time with fines, it is far more effective to inform them that the majority of people in their neighborhood already have paid. By doing so, governments can realize many more millions in revenues.

Not only are we pretty poor at recognizing what will influence our future behavior, we’re not that great at recognizing what persuaded us after the event either. In one well-known study conducted at a busy New York City subway station, after counting the percentage of commuters who donated to a street musician as they walked past him, researchers made one small change to the situation: Immediately before an approaching commuter reached the musician, another person (who was in on the act) would drop a few coins into the musician’s hat. The result? An eight-fold increase in donations. When interviewed afterwards, those who donated universally failed to attribute their actions to the fact they had seen someone else give money first, preferring instead to provide alternate (and incorrect) justification for their actions. “I liked the song he was playing”; “I’m a generous person”; and “I felt sorry for the guy.”

Aside from showing the tremendous power of social proof, the above also provides a solid argument that understanding what will resonate most with a customer may often not be provided by the customer. There’s a great dialogue about this on Wim Rampen’s outstanding and thoughtful blog post titled “The Customer is Always Wrong”.

Cracking the code on your customer’s jobs to be done, their (intrinsic and extrinsic) motivations, their behaviors and habits have the potential to provide the real clues that we need to develop ongoing relationships of increasing value exchange.

So, how will we get better at serving our customers more effectively and building more trust?

The detailed answers to this are highly contextual and we don’t quite have time or room in today’s post. Many of us are indeed overwhelmed by the inertia of our own embedded behaviors, assumptions, and drivers, which by the way is one reason I would propose that we see such a significant disconnect in the chart above. But one often overlooked consideration I’d like to offer is to include the core motivators of all humans when considering what products and services to offer, and more importantly how we communicate with them.

Referencing the research done and presented by Australian psychologist, social researcher and novelist, Hugh Mackay, Naomi Simson offers the following as the core motivators for our (customer’s) decision making:

The desire to be taken seriously. We need to know we exist, that we’re valued, that we’re being listened to. This desire is why good listeners are so valued in the workplace. And why when you feel so bad when you realise someone is looking over your shoulder when you’re talking to them, rather than listening to what you have to say.

The desire for ‘my place’. We all need places that feel like ours, places that symbolise who we are. This is why, for some people, hot desks and open plan offices create a certain amount of disconnect and dissatisfaction at work.



The desire for something to believe in. We all desire a framework of values in our lives, values we can live by. If the organisation we work for has integrity, it can form an important part of our value set.

The desire to connect. Not only do we feel connected to people around us at work through everyday interactions, we also use work to connect deeper to ourselves. For some people their work is an expression of their self. 


The desire to feel useful. The one thing we least want to hear ourselves described as is ‘useless’. Wanting to be useful is fundamental to being part of society. This is the reason that people pull together in times of disaster to help complete strangers… to feel they are doing something useful.

The desire to belong. According to Hugh, we are both ‘herd animals’, and ‘tribal creatures’. We like to feel part of a group, as well as part of something bigger. The best workplace contains rich gratification through both a small herd (work group) and the sense of being a part of the company, the tribe.

The desire for control. Hugh believes this desire is the one most likely to get us into trouble. Humans are by nature uncontrollable. The only person we can control is ourselves.

Three Questions until next time

  • Are you REALLY investing in the customer experience, or does this just seem to be the next best wave to get what you want from customers?
  • How are you aligning your products, services, and customer communications with these core human motivators?
  • How are you weaving offerings and communication into the customer journey that help meet these desires?

What REALLY Matters Now? Beware of “Outlier Amplifiers”

WhichChoice

WhichChoice

Social Media, Big Data, Marketing Automation, and Mobile are the only things that matter now, and all the “cool kids” are heavily investing in gamification and customer experience initiatives.

Of course none of the above are true, but if we are to believe the media around us, you’d think that if you’re not doing all or most of the above, you’re going out of business next year.

It brings to mind the ridiculous valuations of the dot com bubble, or the real estate boom, or those that invested millions in CRM or ERP, only to see a negative return. Fueled by craze and hype, we see valuable resources misallocated, resulting in personal and organizational demise.

As I’ve traveled around the globe, I’ve realized that most people are relatively similar. They work. They eat. They play. They spend time with family and friends and they generally just want to be loved and respected. Whether we’re in Switzerland or Bolivia or Thailand, we all do and want similar things, although these often manifest themselves in slightly different ways. These differences are more pronounced on the edges and that’s where we seem to focus our attention. Everyone in California surfs. Everyone in Texas is a cowboy. Everyone in Manhattan works on Wall Street. We amplify differences because they are…interesting, and attempt to make sense of the world around us.

Highlighted in several past studies, the media effect amplifies the spread and perception of these differences, while influencing where many of us spend our attention.

Images, videos, infographics, blogs, and tweets spreading quickly via network messengers have the propensity to create their own reality as they spread. Many of these Ideaviruses are more potent than they’ve ever been, influencing their recipients in new and different ways that the average citizen can’t quite put their finger on yet.

For creators of ideas, digital content or products, the potential to leverage the effects of emerging digital networks holds tremendous promise. We’ve never experienced a world where billions of people can connect to billions of people instantly. Conversely, as a recipient, the amount of information racing through our streams can be daunting.

Business leaders have the unenviable position of trying separate the signals from the noise, which is increasingly easier said than done.

In an era where the impact and exposure to digital objects, ideas, and content can be exponentially amplified in near real time, how can we know which reverberations will continue to grow louder and more important, and which echoes will simply come and go as quickly as they came, replaced by the next reverberation of the times?

The irony and convincing truth is that some of the things bubbling up from the edges actually matter a lot. In fact, all of the things listed in the opening of this post ARE very important, which is why I spend so much time studying, sharing, and consulting in each of those domains. The people who recognize them first are usually able to capitalize on them the most. One could argue that the only places ripe for innovation in the coming era are indeed the edges, since we continue to normalize innovations with increasing efficiency.

A significant challenge, then, is not whether to recognize or not, or to adopt or not. Those options are too rudimentary and crude. The real issue is how much weight to apply to each of these new technologies and opportunities that present themselves. Not enough, and you will indeed likely fall behind. Overweight the shiny new objects and your core will suffer, and perhaps terminally. The answer to this, my friends, is highly contextual.

On one end of the continuum are the uber-pragmatists who ignore everything new, holding tightly to the traditional until overwhelmingly proven otherwise. On the other end are those who see promise in everything, chasing trends, and bouncing from one idea to another without ever focusing on what really matters. The herd of echo chamber enthusiasts bounce from idea to idea, trumpeting to each other and dancing to the beat of the next new thing.

As we strive for balance between focusing on what matters most while simultaneously keeping a keen eye fixed on emerging opportunities, here are some guidelines that might be helpful:

  • (1) Remind yourself that the fundamentals of business likely won’t change. It’s almost never “different this time”.
  • (2) If you don’t have a solid use case or two, the latest shiny gadget likely isn’t likely for you (at least not yet).
  • (3) Recognize that the “Outlier Amplifier” effect is alive and well. The fringes are repeatedly over-exaggerated to satisfy the media’s gluttonous quest for eyeballs (every company is a media company). In the race for attention, those seeking it will often exaggerate for effect. It’s also important to note that there are no qualifications required to setup a blog, twitter, or youtube account. :) Sift shrewdly.
  • (4) No one knows your business as well as you do. Seek to continually understand your prospects and customers better, and systematically build and align your capabilities to create and provide more value for them. This guiding principle will help stay focused on what matters most for you and your organization now and for the foreseeable future.

What else would you add to this list?